Venue: Nehru Centre-Worli | Date: 19th & 20th of October 2024

Download

Contact

Research Paper

Dear Finalists ,

Congratulations! Four papers have been selected for the prestigious Dr Sameer Pradhan memorial award. The presentation will be conducted on Sunday 20th October-Hall A at 12 .00 noon

The presentation time for 15 slides will be 7 minutes followed by 3 minutes of Qn A.You can load your ppts on Sunday at the Hall A AV centre before 11.30 am.

Please do not display any identity of your institute/place of work. Please write here for any clarifications.

Wish you all the best!

The selected papers are attached here.

Regards,
Abstracts Committee

Dr Sameer Pradhan Finalists at the MASCON 2024

A3 Dr. Renukadevi A prospective observational study of correlation of ultrasonic measurement of distance between skin and epiglottis and Cormack-Lehane grading at laryngoscopy in adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia.
A6 Dr Anubhuti Jain Comparison of dexmedetomidine-propofol versus fentanyl-propofol for insertion of blockbuster laryngeal mask airway under general anesthesia - a double blinded Randomised control trial
A7 Dr Ruby A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED STUDY ON BILATERAL ULTRASOUND GUIDED ERECTOR SPINAE BLOCK FOR POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA IN LUMBAR SPINE FUSION SURGERY
A8 Dr Venkatesh COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT APPROACHES OF ULTRASOUND GUIDED INTERNAL JUGULAR VEIN CANNULATION IN CARDIAC SURGICAL PATIENTS.

Category B Finalists - Judging at Warli Hall 8 AM on Saturday 19th October

B1 Dr Pradnya COMPARISON OF ROPIVACAINE AND BUPIVACAINE FOR SPINAL ANAESTHESIA FOR PERIANAL SURGERIES
B2 Dr Varun TO COMPARE THE EFFICACY OF ULTRASOUND-GUIDED ADDUCTOR CANAL BLOCKADE USING 0.2% ROPIVACAINE WITH 8MG DEXAMETHASONE VERSUS EPIDURAL TOP-UPS OF 0.2% ROPIVACAINE FOR POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING UNILATERAL TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT.
B3 Dr Akhil SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW ON THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF MEDICATION ERRORS IN INDIAN HOSPITAL SETTINGS
B4 Dr Akshay EFFICACY OF INTRAVENOUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE FOR THE TREATMENT OF POST ANAESTHESIA SHIVERING IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING SPINAL ANAESTHESIA
B5 Dr Shiv A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED STUDY OF A COMPARISON ON USG GUIDED TAP BLOCK VERSUS EPIDURAL BLOCK FOR POST-OP ANALGESIA IN GYNECOLOGICAL SURGICAL PATIENTS.
B6 Dr Apeksha COMPARISON OF EFFICACY OF PRE-EMPTIVE CAUDAL ANALGESIA WITH ROPIVACAINE AND BUPIVACAINE, WITH DEXAMETHASONE AS ADDITIVE FOR LUMBOSACRAL SPINE SURGERIES -A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE BLINDED CONTROLLED STUDY.
B7 Dr Mohit A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN EFFECT OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE AND MAGNESIUM SULPHATE AS AN ADJUVANT TO BUPIVACAINE FOR TRANSVERSE ABDOMINIS PLANE BLOCK IN ABDOMINAL SURGERY
B8 Dr Tejas A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PRE-INDUCTION AND POST-INDUCTION PERFUSION INDEX FOR PREDICTING THE SUCCESS OF ULTRASOUND-GUIDED SUPRACLAVICULAR NERVE BLOCKS
B9 Dr Neha COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SUPRACLAVICULAR VERSUS INFRACLAVICULAR APPROACH OF SUBCLAVIAN VEIN CANNULATION
B10 Dr Neha CASE STUDY ON DRUG INDUCED SLEEP ENDOSCOPY
B11 Dr Joslita FAST-TRACKING RECOVERY: COMPARING SUGAMMADEX AND NEOSTIGMINE IN BRAIN SURGERY
B12 Dr Priyal COMPARISON OF THE EFFECT OF SPINAL ANESTHESIA ON HEART RATE AND BLOOD PRESSURE BETWEEN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS ON BETA BLOCKERS OR CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS AND NORMOTENSIVE PATIENTS IN BELOW UMBILICUS SURGERY
B13 Dr Archana Behl NALBUPHINE VERSUS BUTORPHANOL AS AN ADJUVANT TO INTRATHECAL 0.5% HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE FOR LOWER LIMB SURGERY: A COMPARATIVE, OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
B14 Dr Ishita COMPARISON BETWEEN LIGNOCAINE NEBULIZATION AND AIRWAY NERVE BLOCK FOR AWAKE FIBER OPTIC GUIDED NASOTRACHEAL INTUBATION
B15 Dr Prerana CARDIAC OUTPUT MONITORING USING FLOTRAC MONITOR IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CARDIAC SURGERIES IN THE POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD - A PROSPECTIVE, OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
B16 Dr Vidhi Solanki A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INTRAVENOUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE HCL AND FENTANYL CITRATE FOR ATTENUATING THE HEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE TO LARYNGOSCOPYAND DOUBLE-LUMEN ENDOBRONCHIAL INTUBATION
B17 Dr Ayesha ANALYSIS OF PATIENT SAFETY CRITICAL INCIDENTS IN UROSURGERY AT A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL: A PROSPECTIVE AND RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

Original Research-MASCON 2024

Best 5 Original research papers will vie for the prestigious Dr Sameer Pradhan Memorial Award at the MASCON 2024.

First Prize – Medal & Rs 51,000/-

Second Prize- Rs 25,000/-

Third Prize – Rs 12,500/-

Rules :

  • The presenter should be part of the team that conducted the research or should be his/her thesis
  • The presenter should be registered for the MASCON 2024
  • Judges' decision will be final
  • Last date for submission will be 6th October 2024
  • The presenter should by less than 35 years of age. Kindly mention your date of birth in the e mail during submission

Steps:

  1. Submit your original research in the prescribed format-E mail to masconscientific@gmail.com
  2. Prepare your PPT in the prescribed format sent to you with the acceptance mail
  3. Five papers will be selected for the podium presentation for the Dr Sameer Pradhan Memorial award. This will be intimated to you in the 1st week of October 2024.
  4. All the rest of the submitted original research not selected for the final five will be presented as podium ppt presentations -Category B and will compete for a prize money of Rs 12,000/Rs 10,000/Rs 7,500.

Guidelines for full text original article to be submitted for “Dr Sameer Pradhan Memorial Award Category”

Original articles in this award category should include original research work in anaesthesia critical care, resuscitation, pain medicine and allied sciences.

The article file should be accompanied by a structured abstract of no more than 250 words under the following headings: 1.Backround and Aims 2. Methods (make a brief mention of statistical methods used) 3. Results and 4. Conclusion.

The abstract should be followed by ‘MeSH’ compatible 3-7 keywords (https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh). The abstract shall not contain references.

The main article file should be written under only the following four headings: Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion and Conclusion.

Introduction: State the purpose and summarize the rationale for the study or observation. The introduction should describe in brief the background related to the study and also the need for carrying out the present study. Limit the number of references cited in the introduction to 4-6 only. Please include aims and objectives in introduction itself.

Methods: It should include and describe the following aspects (do not use the headings in the manuscript /article):

The methods section should start out describing the nature of the study (randomized / blinded / prospective / retrospective, etc). Selection and Description of Participants: Describe your selection of the observational or experimental participants (patients or laboratory animals, including controls) clearly, including eligibility and exclusion criteria and a description of the source population. Technical information: Identify the methods, apparatus (give the manufacturer's name and address in parentheses), and procedures in sufficient detail to allow other workers to reproduce the results. Give references to established methods, including statistical methods (see below); provide references and brief descriptions for methods that have been published but are not well known; describe new or substantially modified methods, give reasons for using them, and evaluate their limitations. Identify precisely all drugs and chemicals used, including generic name(s), dose(s), and route(s) of administration.

Reports of randomized clinical trials should present information on all major study elements, including the protocol, assignment of interventions (methods of randomization, concealment of allocation to treatment groups), and the method of masking (blinding), based on the CONSORT Statement (http://www.consort-statement.org).

Statistical Methods:

Start this section in a separate paragraph(without placing the heading “statistics”).Whenever possible quantify findings and present them with appropriate indicators of measurement error or uncertainty (such as confidence intervals). Authors should report losses to observation (such as dropouts from a clinical trial). When data are summarized in the Results section, specify the statistical methods used to analyze them.

Results:

Present your results in a logical sequence in the text, tables, and illustrations, giving the main or most important findings first. Do not repeat in the text all the data in the tables or illustrations; emphasize or summarize only important observations. Restrict tables and figures to a total of 6 only (preferable to have most relevant tables and figures), needed to explain the argument of the paper and to assess its support. Use graphs as an alternative to tables with many entries; do not duplicate data in graphs and tables. The legends must be brief and relevant and the units of measurement must be clearly mentioned in tables and graphs, with the group names also mentioned in the same fashion as in the Methods section.

Discussion:

Include summary of key findings (primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, results as they relate to a prior hypothesis):Confounding variables, strengths and limitations of the study. Interpretation and implications in the context of the totality of evidence (is there a systematic review to refer to, if not, could one be reasonably done here and now?, what this study adds to the available evidence, any new possible mechanisms etc):Controversies raised by this study; and Future research directions (for this particular research collaboration, underlying mechanisms, clinical research etc). Do not repeat in detail data or other material given in the Introduction or the Results section. In particular, contributors should avoid making statements on economic benefits and costs unless their manuscript includes economic data and analyses. Avoid claiming priority and alluding to work that has not been completed. New hypotheses may be stated if needed, however they should be clearly labelled as such. These articles generally can have 6-8 authors, with correct details of their contribution entered in the first page / cover page file.

Type of submission Maximum number of authors allowed Abstract (Maximum word count) Article (Maximum word count) Supplementary material References
Original Article Six Structured: Background and Aims, Methods, Results and Conclusion (250) Structured: Introduction (with 4-6 references), Methods, Results, Discussion and Conclusion (3000) Max. six (Tables, graphs and Figures included) Maximum 30

References:

References should be numbered consecutively in the order in which they are first mentioned in the text (not in alphabetic order). Identify references in text, tables, and legends by Arabic numerals in square bracket after the punctuation marks.

Reference writing style:

  1. Standard journal article (for up to six authors): Shukla N, Husain N, Agarwal GG, Husain M. Utility of cysticercus fasciolaris antigen in Dot ELISA for the diagnosis of neurocysticercosis. Indian J Med Sci 2008;62:222-7.

  2. Standard journal article (for more than six authors): List the first six contributors followed by et al. Nozari Y, Hashemlu A, Hatmi ZN, Sheikhvatan M, Iravani A, Bazdar A, et al. Outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting in patients without major risk factors and patients with at least one major risk factor for coronary artery disease. Indian J Med Sci 2007;61:547-54

General Instructions:

  • UK English should be used uniformly throughout the text [e.g., anaesthesia (NOT anesthesia), haemoglobin (NOT hemoglobin), programme (NOT program), haemodynamics (NOT hemodynamics), etc]
  • Use only universally approved abbreviations (e.g., hour, minute, kilogram can be written as h, min, kg and NOT as hrs or hr, mts, kgs etc. Similarly, microgram should be expressed by the appropriate symbol ‘µg’ and should not be represented by mcg or in any other form.)
  • Avoid starting a sentence with numerical. If it has to start with a number, write the numerical in words.
  • Wherever single digit numbers are written in the write-up, write in words and not in numbers unless the numbers are accompanied by units of measurement.
  • All the points in the article should be written as running statements and should not be presented in bulleted / numbered format, except in review articles.